3Ultraviolet radiation and plant biology Investigations of UV effects on plant biology largely depend on the use of UV B emitting lamps in both laboratory and eld (see Tevini (1994) and Bornman and Teramura (1993) for reviews).
Interpretation of results from such systems is, however, restricted by an inability to mimic the solar spectrum precisely (Figure 12.17). As a consequence, comparisons between species with respect to UV B sensitivity, and analyses of processes responsible for variation in sensitivity, must be treated circumspectly. Despite these methodological limitations, overall outcomes are unambiguous: UV B radiation impacts on many aspects of plant biology. Sensitivity to UV B irradiation includes any morphological, physiological or biochemical change induced by UV B. Signicant effects have been reported for about half of the 300 or so crop species and cultivars studied so far, but with some notable variation (Table 12.1). Sensitivity is most noticeable with regard to alterations in plant growth and development (Teramura 1983). Reduction in leaf area, stem growth (stunting) and total plant biomass are commonplace. Additional symptoms include bronzing and glazing of leaf surfaces (Tevini 1993; see Figure 12.17 for generalised action spectrum). Growth reductions depend not only on the level of UV B exposure but on the associated level of photosynthetic active radiation. Moreover, intrinsic susceptibility varies within crop species, with signicant differences between cultivars widely reported (Teramura and Murali 1986). Partitioning of growth to different organs, for example altered internode length, or leaf production, is also sensitive ray ban 2011 collection to UV B irradiation (Teramura 1983). Such morphological changes may not be signicant to plants in isolation but may influence competitive interactions, and especially their competition for sunlight. Sensitivity to UV B irradiation also varies with life cycle. Especially prominent are photosynthesis, ray ban 2012 signal transduction and nucleic acid metabolism. In general, UV B radiation causes a net inhibition of photosynthesis in a wide range of plants (see Tevini 1993). From laboratory studies, this inhibition appears to arise from disruptions at a number of points in the photosynthetic cycle including disruption of PSII reaction centres (Strid et al. 1990), a decrease in Rubisco activity and damage to photosynthetic pigments (chlorophylls and carotenoids). Stomatal function, and thus leaf gas exchange, is also commonly impaired (Teramura 1983; Tevini and Teramura 1989). Alterations in plant growth induced by UV B radiation have been partly attributed to changes in nucleic acid structure and function (Beggs et al. 1986; Tevini 1994). DNA absorbs strongly in the UV region and is thus especially prone to damage by UV B radiation (Figure 12.17). The most common lesions are breaks in DNA chains, with a resultant production of thymine dimers. They in turn interfere with accurate base pairing, leading to a disruption of transcription and replication of DNA (Stapleton 1992). These disruptions amount to a mutagenic action for UV radiation in many organisms. Proteins and RNA can also absorb UV B and are inactivated as a result, but this loss is of secondary importance due to their relative abundance compared with DNA (Stapleton 1992). Activation and photo deactivation of important signal molecules, such as hormones and photoreceptors, may also compound effects of UV B irradiation on plant growth and development. For example, cell extension in many plants is influenced by indole acetic acid (IAA) which absorbs in the UV B region and is photo oxidised to 3 methyleneoxindole, an inhibitor of hypocotyl growth when exogenously applied (Tevini and Teramura 1989). In contrast, irradiation ray ban sunglasses on sale with UV B can induce enzyme activity in the shikimic acid pathway, which regulates the synthesis of a broad array of plant compounds ranging from flavonoids to lignin, all of which are important to plant function, including tolerance to UV B radiation (Caldwell et al. 1989). (c) pollination and seed development are variously affected by UV B irradiation. Flowering also appears to be disrupted by UV B radiation with decreases in flower number and alteration in timing reported in the few species so far studied (Tevini and Teramura 1989). Such effects may have important consequences for natural plant populations which rely on the synchrony of flowering with the presence of appropriate insect pollinators. Although pollen appears resilient to UV B radiation damage, owing to high levels of flavonoids in the anthers and pollen wall, germinating pollen tubes are highly sensitive to UV radiation and suffer from large decreases in growth rate. Such disruption can lead to lowered fertilisation success and decreases in seed yield (Tevini and Teramura 1989). (d) variation in sensitivity to UV B radiation has implications for plant competition and thus plant ecosystem dynamics and community structure, in both natural and managed ecosystems. Gold and Caldwell (1983), for example, showed that competition between seven agricultural crops and associated weeds was signicantly altered under enhanced UV B irradiation in the eld, Triticum aestivum (bread wheat) being outcompeted by Avena fatua (wild oat) essentially through differences in the rates of biomass production. By contrast, wheat growth under enhanced UV B was favoured when in competition with Aegilops cylindrica (goat grass). In the few studies considering the impact of UV B irradiation on natural plant communities most notable is the work of Caldwell and colleagues (Caldwell et al. 1982) who found that arctic plant species are much more sensitive to UV B, both in terms of growth and reproduction, than alpine species. Arctic species grow under a naturally low UV B environment, whereas alpine species grow under a ray band glasses naturally high UV B environment by virtue of higher altitude. Arctic plant com munities could thus be altered to a greater extent than alpine communities by any substantial rise in natural UV B. (e) tolerance mechanisms Many organisms have evolved mechanisms to undo the molecular damage caused by UV radiation. Possibly the most adaptive are terrestrial plants that rely on full sunlight for photosynthesis. Protective mechanisms can be classied into two main classes: (1) those whereby UV damage is repaired or its effects negated or minimised, and (2) those whereby the amount of UV radiation actually reaching sensitive areas is reduced. While protective in nature, all of these mechanisms impose an energy cost on plants so adapted. Considering the rst class of protective mechanism, organisms have developed three important repair processes for UV induced DNA damage (Stapleton 1992): (1) photoreactivation, a light induced enzymatic process which cleaves pyrimidine dimers formed by UV radiation thus restoring proper base pairing; (2) excision repair of DNA, which involves the excision of UV photoproducts from DNA molecules (this mechanism requires no light energy and uses undamaged DNA templates as a guide); and (3) post replication repair, where DNA lesions are bypassed during DNA replication and information from the sister duplex is later used to ll gaps. As mentioned above, plant growth and development is slowed by exposure to enhanced UV B radiation, and especially in sensitive plants. Ironically, such delay also minimises adverse effects from damage that has occurred. Growth delay and slower cell division provides additional time for DNA repair mechanisms to operate ahead of any recommencement in DNA replication (Beggs et al. 1986). Screening sensitive tissues from UV B radiation is a secondary option available to plants either to avoid or at least minimise damage. Tissue screening may be achieved through structural modication of organs or by screening molecules which absorb UV radiation. Such features may be either static, as with leaf orientation or phototaxis, or dynamic, as in synthesis of screening molecules which absorb UV radiation in a highly selective way. Screening molecules commonly appear after exposure to UV radiation (Beggs et al. 1986) as secondary metabolites such as flavonoids. Substantial amounts of such pigments accumulate especially in the upper epidermis of leaves. Along with cuticular waxes and other cellular components, these substances attenuate incident UV radiation, and energy transmitted to underlying tissue is decreased by up to two orders of magnitude (Figure 12.19; Beggs et al. 1986). Flavonoid pigments are synthesised by leaves on many plants in direct response to UV radiation. In their extremes such factors can lead to stresses such as water stress, mineral stress, temperature stress, disease and stresses due to anthropogenic pollution (ozone, acid rain). The interaction of UV B irradiation stress with other environmental factors has been examined in only a few cases, essentially because of the difculty of simulating elevated UV B irradiation in the eld. Of the environmental interactions studied water stress appears to influence plant responses induced by UV B irradiation. In soybean, for example, a decrease in yield in sensitive cultivars under elevated UV B irradiation was most apparent under well watered conditions. Water decit in combination with elevated UV B irradiation did not reduce yield to a greater extent than water decit alone (Tevini and Teramura 1989). Water stress may therefore mask UV B responses of plants. Elevated CO2 levels may also modify the response of sensitive plants to UV B irradiation. In rice and wheat (but not in soybean) an increase in seed yield and biomass under elevated CO2 was reversed under moderate levels of supplementary UV B irradiation (Teramura et al. 1990). UV B irradiation appears to exacerbate the impact of plant pathogens. In one of a limited number of published ndings, UV B intensies adverse effects of Cercospora beticola (leaf spot) on sugar beet. Symptoms include greater loss of chlorophyll and dry mass under UV B and leaf spot fungus than occurs with leaf spot fungus alone (Panagopoulos et al. 1992).
Interactions between UV B radiation and other environ mental factors are obviously complex and their combined effects on plant responses cannot be predicted from single factor experiments. Global changes in coming decades such as elevated CO2 and higher temperatures will most likely be superimposed on a predicted increase in UV B radiation. Consequently, studies of combined impacts of environmental factors and UV B radiation will be necessary if plant breeders are to select crop varieties that are better adapted to cope with these stresses, and for ecologists to predict likely outcomes for natural ecosystems.
Prev: ray ban large metal
Next: ray bans sunglasses